loader image
array(2) {
  ["en"]=>
  array(13) {
    ["code"]=>
    string(2) "en"
    ["id"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["native_name"]=>
    string(7) "English"
    ["major"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["active"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["default_locale"]=>
    string(5) "en_US"
    ["encode_url"]=>
    string(1) "0"
    ["tag"]=>
    string(2) "en"
    ["missing"]=>
    int(0)
    ["translated_name"]=>
    string(7) "English"
    ["url"]=>
    string(139) "https://gffklportal.org/knowledge/taking-stock-of-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-the-health-sector-findings-from-rwanda-and-uganda-2/"
    ["country_flag_url"]=>
    string(86) "https://gffklportal.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/flags/en.png"
    ["language_code"]=>
    string(2) "en"
  }
  ["fr"]=>
  array(13) {
    ["code"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
    ["id"]=>
    string(1) "4"
    ["native_name"]=>
    string(9) "Français"
    ["major"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["active"]=>
    int(0)
    ["default_locale"]=>
    string(5) "fr_FR"
    ["encode_url"]=>
    string(1) "0"
    ["tag"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
    ["missing"]=>
    int(0)
    ["translated_name"]=>
    string(6) "French"
    ["url"]=>
    string(142) "https://gffklportal.org/fr/knowledge/taking-stock-of-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-the-health-sector-findings-from-rwanda-and-uganda-2/"
    ["country_flag_url"]=>
    string(86) "https://gffklportal.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/flags/fr.png"
    ["language_code"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
  }
}
array(2) {
  ["en"]=>
  array(13) {
    ["code"]=>
    string(2) "en"
    ["id"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["native_name"]=>
    string(7) "English"
    ["major"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["active"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["default_locale"]=>
    string(5) "en_US"
    ["encode_url"]=>
    string(1) "0"
    ["tag"]=>
    string(2) "en"
    ["missing"]=>
    int(0)
    ["translated_name"]=>
    string(7) "English"
    ["url"]=>
    string(139) "https://gffklportal.org/knowledge/taking-stock-of-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-the-health-sector-findings-from-rwanda-and-uganda-2/"
    ["country_flag_url"]=>
    string(86) "https://gffklportal.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/flags/en.png"
    ["language_code"]=>
    string(2) "en"
  }
  ["fr"]=>
  array(13) {
    ["code"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
    ["id"]=>
    string(1) "4"
    ["native_name"]=>
    string(9) "Français"
    ["major"]=>
    string(1) "1"
    ["active"]=>
    int(0)
    ["default_locale"]=>
    string(5) "fr_FR"
    ["encode_url"]=>
    string(1) "0"
    ["tag"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
    ["missing"]=>
    int(0)
    ["translated_name"]=>
    string(6) "French"
    ["url"]=>
    string(142) "https://gffklportal.org/fr/knowledge/taking-stock-of-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-the-health-sector-findings-from-rwanda-and-uganda-2/"
    ["country_flag_url"]=>
    string(86) "https://gffklportal.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/flags/fr.png"
    ["language_code"]=>
    string(2) "fr"
  }
}
string(2) "en"
string(9) "knowledge"

Taking Stock of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the Health Sector: Findings From Rwanda and Uganda

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Date

  • September 27, 2021

About this resource

In the context of sector-wide approaches and the considerable funding being put into the health sectors of low-income countries, the need to invest in well-functioning national health sector monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems is widely acknowledged. Regardless of the approach adopted, an important first step in any strategy for capacity development is to diagnose the quality of existing systems or arrangements, taking into account both the supply and demand sides of M&E. As no standardized M&E diagnostic instrument currently exists, we first invested in the development of an assessment tool for sector M&E systems. To counter the criticism that M&E is often narrowed down to a focus on technicalities, our diagnostic tool assesses the quality of M&E systems according to six dimensions: (i) policy; (ii) quality of indicators and data (collection) and methodology; (iii) organization (further divided into iiia: structure and iiib: linkages); (iv) capacity; (v) participation of non-government actors and (vi) M&E outputs: quality and use.

Comments

You must have an account to comment. Please sign in or create an account.

Download started! You can view your downloaded file in your downloads folder

Error An error has ocurred